External footprint mapping
Build a clearer view of in-scope domains, public services, certificates and related infrastructure signals.
Attack surface contextASINT / OSINT Intelligence
See the connections behind digital exposure.
Bring authorized public-source research and external attack-surface intelligence together to map relevant digital footprints, connect signals and give security teams a clearer basis for action.
Scoped researchSource-aware analysisActionable reporting
Digital footprint graphEntities · infrastructure · public signals
Relationship viewOrganizationAuthorized scope
Select a node to inspect its intelligence context
01
Digital footprint
Map domains and public records that are in scope for the review.
Scoped discoveryStart with approved identifiers
Connected contextRelate signals to the environment
Source-aware findingsKeep provenance and confidence clear
Practical prioritiesFocus follow-up on relevant exposure
Intelligence support
Turn public information into useful security context.
Large volumes of public data are difficult to interpret on their own. We organize relevant findings around your approved scope, explain how sources connect and identify signals that merit follow-up.
Entity and relationship research
Correlate approved organization identifiers with relevant public records and source-backed relationships.
Relationship analysisExposure and signal review
Surface public indicators that may warrant validation by the appropriate security or incident response team.
Prioritized signalsConnected coverage
Follow relationships, not just search results.
Useful intelligence connects observations to entities, timeframes and sources. We distinguish reported information from validated observations and show where further confirmation is needed.
Research is scoped to authorized subjects and appropriate sources. Sensitive personal information is handled proportionately and only when relevant to the agreed security purpose.
Digital identifiers
Domains, subdomains, certificates, public code references and other approved organization identifiers.
Infrastructure clues
Public service indicators and technology references that help teams review their external footprint.
Relationships and attribution
Source-backed links between entities, brands, systems and relevant public records, with uncertainty called out.
Time-sensitive signals
Public mentions or exposure indicators organized to support triage and determine whether validation is needed.
Source quality & validation
Use sources in context. Corroborate before acting.
Available information can be incomplete, outdated or incorrectly attributed. Research should connect records to the right organization and preserve enough context for teams to judge whether a signal deserves follow-up.
Public infrastructure data
Review relevant domain, DNS, certificate and service references associated with approved organization identifiers.
Published material
Use official sites, public documentation, reports and filings to clarify products, ownership references and known services.
Code and external mentions
Consider publicly indexed repositories, advisories and media references when relevant to the agreed security purpose.
Validation matters: a search result is a lead, not proof of current exposure. We note source dates, corroboration and attribution limits, and separate observed facts from analytical inference.
Research workflow
Move from scope to well-grounded findings.
A repeatable process keeps research relevant, transparent and easier for security teams to act on.
Confirm authorization
Agree the subject identifiers, research purpose, boundaries, sources and handling requirements.
Collect relevant signals
Review appropriate public information connected to the approved organization or external footprint.
Assess relationships
Connect records carefully, preserve source context and distinguish evidence from inference.
Prioritize follow-up
Explain confidence, relevance and recommended validation or remediation owners.
Intelligence deliverables
Give teams a map they can use to decide what comes next.
Deliverables connect the research to security workflows, with source context and clear limits so teams can distinguish actionable findings from leads that need more validation.
Entity relationship view
Show relevant identifiers and relationships within the approved scope.
Source and confidence notes
Record where signals came from and whether they were independently validated.
Prioritized follow-up
Identify owners and next steps for review, validation or remediation.
Where teams use intelligence
Support security decisions with relevant external context.
ASINT/OSINT research can support different security activities when the subject, source types and intended use are defined up front.
External footprint baseline
Help security teams understand public-facing identifiers and plan deeper authorized testing where useful.
Security postureIncident triage context
Organize relevant public signals and timelines to help authorized response teams assess next steps.
Incident supportThird-party exposure review
Map selected public dependencies and supplier references to inform vendor risk discussions.
Supply chain contextCommon questions
Keep intelligence relevant and responsible.
Research quality depends on the scope, sources and intended security use. Here are a few common questions about the work.
Here, ASINT refers to attack-surface intelligence: organizing information about an organization’s public digital footprint. OSINT is research using appropriate, publicly available sources. The exact scope and terminology are confirmed for each engagement.
No. Public-source research can identify signals and potential exposure, but it does not automatically validate a technical weakness. Active testing requires separate authorization and a defined scope.
Findings retain source context and are described with appropriate confidence. Conflicts, attribution limits and items that need independent validation are called out in the report.
Work is scoped around a legitimate, authorized security purpose and minimizes personal data collection. Any people-related research requires explicit justification, appropriate authorization and agreed handling boundaries.
Provide the organization identifiers you control, the question you need answered, any excluded subjects and how findings should be handled. We confirm boundaries before research begins.
Map your digital footprint
Turn scattered public signals into a clearer security picture.
Tell us the identifiers in scope and the security question you are trying to answer. We can shape a source-aware intelligence review around your needs.